W.E.B. Du Bois vs. Booker T. Washington - 2991 Words

n Described variously as the most outspoken civil rights activist in America, the undisputed intellectual leader of a new generation of African- American, and the central authorizing figure for twentieth-century African-American thought, Du Bois was the inspiration for the literary movement known as the Harlem Renaissance. As a co-founder of the NAACP and the long-time editor of its magazine The Crisis, Du Bois nurtured and promoted many young and talented African-Americans. Underlying his controversial notion of the talented tenth, was his belief that true integration will happen when selected blacks excel in the literature and the fine arts. William Edward Burghardt DuBois, to his admirers, was by spirited devotion and†¦show more content†¦Easing On Down The Road At the age of twenty-six, with twenty years of schooling behind him, DuBois felt that he was ready to begin his lifes work. He accepted a teaching job at Wilberforce in Ohio at the going rate of $800.00 per year. (He also had offers from Lincoln in Missouri and Tuskegee in Alabama.) The year 1896 was the dawn of a new era for DuBois. With his doctorate degree and two undistinguished years at Wilberforce behind him, he readily accepted a special fellowship at the University of Pennsylvania to conduct a research project in Philadelphias seventh ward slums. This responsibility afforded him the opportunity to study Blacks as a social system. DuBois plunged eagerly into his research. He was certain that the race problem was one of ignorance. And he was determined to unearth as much knowledge as he could, thereby providing the cure for color prejudice. His relentless studies led into historical investigation, statistical and anthropological measurement, and sociological interpretation. The outcome of this exhaustive endeavor was published as The Philadelphia Negro. It revealed the Negro group as a symptom, not a cause; as a striving, palpitating group, and not an inert, sick body of crime; as a long historic development and not a transient occurrence. This was theShow MoreRelatedW.E.B. Du Bois vs. Booker T. Washington1344 Words   |  6 PagesA Clash of Ideologies: W.E.B. Du Bois vs. Booker T. Washington During the turn of the century, between the years 1895 and 1915 there were many theories of how African Americans were going to achieve first-class citizenship. At this time first-class citizenship was determined by at least three aspects: political power, civil rights, and the higher education of Negro youth. Two prominent black leaders arose in order to accomplish this feat. They had two different ideas for one goal. These two blackRead More W.E.B Du Bois vs. Booker T Washington Essay2087 Words   |  9 Pagesbe left out; Booker T. Washington and W.E.B Du Bois. They were both African-American leaders in the late 1800’s to early 1900’s, fighting for social justice, education and civil rights for slaves, and both stressed education. This was a time when blacks were segregated and discriminated against. Both these men had a vision to free blacks from this oppression. While they came from different backgrounds, Washington coming from a plantation in Virginia where he wa s a slave, and Du Bois coming from aRead MoreWilliam Edward Burgardt : African American Leading Sociologist, Writer, And Activist Essay713 Words   |  3 Pageswell as, a chair for the Peace information Center (Staff, 2009). Du Bois and Washington has quite the rivalry over the racial uplift. Furthermore, Brooker T. Washington was another leader of the African- American leaders of the 19th and the 20th Century (Brooker T. Washington, 2015). He was the founder of Tuskegee University (Brooker T. Washington, 2015). Brooker put himself through school, and became a teacher (Brooker T. Washington, 2015).. However, the Tuskegee University he founded focused onRead MoreThe Clash Of Two Great Minds Essay1447 Words   |  6 PagesAlexander Hamilton vs Aaron Burr, Stalin vs. Trotsky Michelangelo vs. Da Vinci and of course Booker T. Washington vs. W.E.B Du bois. Although both different ideologies, they were both trying to reach the same goal, equality. Although Washington was more economics based and Dubois was more ideology based they both wanted the same outcome, however Dubois approach seems more practical but both have successes and failures, and can be learned from today. The main argument of Booker T. Washington is that he wantedRead MoreBooker T Washington Vs W. E. B De Dubois Essay1445 Words   |  6 PagesHow can two people that our similar but at the time have different ways of life come together to achieve the same goal?Imagine 30 years after slavery ended you because of the color of your skin are still being mistreated. During the time of Booker and W.E.B the Jim crow law was created to segregate blacks and whites. Because of the segregation blacks had their own society like community only dealing with each other. Blacks were separated from society, they had their own neighborhoods buildings theyRead MoreA Comparison Of Booker T Washington And W. E. De Dubois1532 Words   |  7 PagesHow can two people that our similar but at the time have different ways of life come together to achieve the same goal?Imagine 30 years after slavery ended you because of the color of your skin are still being mistreated. During the time of Booker and W.E.B t he Jim crow law was created to segregate blacks and whites. Because of the segregation blacks had their own society like community only dealing with each other. Blacks were separated from society, they had their own neighborhoods buildings theyRead MoreThe Strategies of Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. Du Bois: Uncovered1925 Words   |  8 PagesMikayla Ferchaw Pd. 4/5 DBQ for Booker T. Washington vs. W.E.B. Du Bois The Strategies of Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. Du Bois: Uncovered The time period of 1877 to 1915 was a period in history when the people of the Black race were being granted a free status, but equality, on the other hand, was not an option to some higher white officials. During this time period, many leaders started to fight for what they believed in by appealing to the white governing body for social equality. TwoRead MoreWeb Du Bois vs. Booker T. Washington: Who Was Right?1711 Words   |  7 PagesWEB Du Bois vs. Booker T. Washington: Who was right? by San Two great leaders of the black community in the late 19th and 20th century were W.E.B. Du Bois and Booker T. Washington. However, they sharply disagreed on strategies for black social and economic progress. Their opposing philosophies can be found in much of todays discussions over how to end class and racial injustice, what is the role of black leadership, and what do the haves owe the have-nots in the black community. W.E.B. DuBoisRead MoreThe Appropriateness of Booker T. Washington and W. E. B. Du Bois Strategies for Dealing with Problems Faced by African Americans2275 Words   |  10 PagesEssential Question: Booker T. Washington and W. E. B. Du Bois offered different strategies for dealing with the problems of poverty and discrimination faced by Black Americans at the end of the nineteenth and beginning of the twentieth centuries. Assess the appropriateness of each of these strategies in the historical context in which each was developed. After the period where big businesses operated the country to benefit themselves, the middle class activists began to rise against these unjustRead MoreGarvey vs. Du Bois1980 Words   |  8 PagesThe Common Difference’s of Elitism Vs. Nationalism The often fierce ideological exchanges between Marcus Garvey and W.E.B. Du Bois are interesting, not as much because of the eloquence of their expression, as because of the fact that although outwardly contradictory, these ideologies were often unified at their foundation. This unity was not simply in terms of the broad and obvious intent to better the conditions of â€Å"black folk†, it was in terms of the very details that defined the trajectory and

The Prevailing Topic Of Illegal Immigration - 1860 Words

Why does the prevailing topic of illegal immigration seem to displeasure many American viewpoints when the United States of America was solely constructed by illegal immigrants? In order to establish an objective and thoroughly examine the viewpoints on this sensitive subject, I thought it would be in the best of our interest to examine and confer as many separate and opposing viewpoints as possible. Nonetheless, my research indicates that it seems everyone in the United States of America and abroad has their own point of view on said topic. However, I will condense this discussion to two viewpoints; they are as follows: Those that disapprove of illegal immigration and want said illegal immigrants released back to their country of origin,†¦show more content†¦No clear agreement has been made in regards to what will happen to the millions of illegal immigrants that currently are in the United States of America to this day, yet I am not doubtful that this heated debate will be come more elevated once our presidential elections occur next November. I personally believe this will be the true driving factor for a conclusion on what occurs with this illegal immigration issue we are witnessing today. Correspondingly, there are various reasons as to why many oppose immigration. For example, some have anti-racially fueled reasoning to their beliefs; then there are those that simply reject any type of immigration because of racist sentiments. Additionally, people are negligent to both illegal and legal immigration essentially because of the belief that our population’s levels will increase uncontrollably, which can ultimately cause a higher unemployment rate and skyrocket crime and poverty within the United States of America.(3) While said reasons are more in relation to socioeconomics above any other subtopic, one could state the primordial issue is due to fear of a negative influence at an individual level as well as a demolished environment. Research un veils that this argument should be supported, especially when you realize that, as senior demographer Jeffrey S. Passel at Pew Research Center states, that there are more than 8.1 million illegal alien workers with more than 11.3

Trends of Logistics free essay sample

They are talking about the new trends of logistics areas. The useful words which may be involved in the dialog are as follows. Please try to design the dialog. J(John) T(Tom) T: Hello Mr. Jonh,these days I have read some books on the the trends of logistics in the future. But I found that articles about the field is not as enough as I expected. I think the problem has an important significance for the future development of logistics. So I would like to ask your opinion about this aspect. J:Research in this area is also interested to me, and I also did a lot of related research. It provides guidance for developing effective,efficient logistics. T:So what kind of development trend do you think the future logistics will have? J: In fact, I think we should have four aspects. The first is Green Logistics. It grow out the growing awareness of environmental problems,and in particular with well-publicized issues such as acid rain ,CFCs and global warming. The transportation industry is a major contributor to environmental degradation. T:So what is the exact definition of green logistics? J: The so-called green logistics, is to reduce the pollution of the environment, reduce the consumption of resources as the goal, the use of advanced logistics technology planning and implementation of transport, storage, handling, distribution processing, distribution, packaging and logistics activities. T:What will Green Logistics bring us ? J:The implementation of green logistics development strategy, vigorously strengthen the establishment and perfection of theoretical system and policy of green logistics, improvement and adjustment of the objectives of the logistics system, logistics facilities and logistics activities of the organization, to achieve the overall optimization of the logistics system and the environment of the low damage, not only conducive to environmental protection and sustainable development of economy, and helpful to improve the management level of logistics in Chinas overall, significance for Chinas economic development major. T:oh,I Know. What else except Green logistics? J: The second is Third Party Logistics. It is a business model of logistics service provided by the third party except both the supplier of logistics service and the demander. TPL is also referred to as outsourcing or contractual logistics. And outsourcing is the operation that the manufacturers or sales focus on their core competition and make a contract with TPL to get logistics service partly or entirely. T:What is the third party logistics development trend in the future? J:Entered in twenty-first Century, with the rapid development of modern logistics industry as an emerging industry, the domestic logistics companies such as bamboo shoots after a spring rain is like the emerge in large numbers, and the formation of the third party logistics industry. Compared with traditional logistics, third party logistics more professional, comprehensive and lower cost, higher efficiency of distribution, has become the trend of international logistics, socialization and the development of modern logistics in the direction of. T:what is the superiority of the development of the third party logistics ? J: The background of competition intensifies day by day and the social division of labor is increasingly refined, logistics outsourcing has obvious advantages, specific performance in: 1. Enterprises focus on their core business. Because any enterprises resources are limited, it is difficult to become the expert service above all to. Therefore, enterprises should be the main resources of their focus on their good at business, the logistics function to logistics company. 2. Flexibility in the use of new technologies, in order to realize the information for inventory, reduce costs 3. The decline in fixed asset investment, accelerate capital turnover. The enterprise need to invest a lot of funds for the purchase of logistics equipment, warehouse and information network construction of specialized logistics equipment. These resources for lack of funds of enterprises especially the small and medium-sized enterprise is a heavy burden. And if the use of third party logistics companies not only reduce facility investment, but also the liberation of the warehouse and the teams occupation of funds, accelerate the capital turnover. 4. Provide flexible customer service, for customers to create more value. T: Will the development of the third party logistics bring disadvantage? J: Of course, compared with the self-run logistics, third party logistics provides the convenience for the enterprises at the same time, also bring a lot of adverse to the enterprise. Mainly has: the enterprise can not control the logistics function directly; can not guarantee the delivery of accurate and timely; can not guarantee the quality of customer service and maintain long-term relationships with customers; enterprises will give up on the logistics professional and technical development. For example, enterprises in the use of third party logistics, third party logistics company employees frequent exchanges, and your customers at this time, the overall image of third party logistics companies will be through the spraying its own mark on the conveyance or let employees wear uniform dress and other ways to promote the third party logistics company in the customer heart to replace your position. T: Oh,I see. After your introduction I already know a lot about the third party logistics knowledge. J: In addition to the above two points, logistics has a very important trend is the reverse logistics T: Reverse logistics? J: Reverse logistics is the management of all the activities involved in goods,demand information,and money flowing in the opposite direction of the primary logistics flow. It involves reducing the generation of waste ,as well as managing the collection,transpot,disposal,and recying of both hazardous and non-hazardous waste in a way that minimizes the long-term profitability. T: I do not understand very well. J: In other words, Reverse logistics from in the hands of customers products and packaging products, components, materials and other materials flow. In short, the reverse logistics is from the hands of customers recycle used, outdated or damaged products and packaging process began, until the final processing. But now more and more generally accepted view is, the reverse logistics is in the entire product life cycle of products and supplies complete, effective and efficient use of the coordination process. T: So that is what it is. J: But the reverse logistics at this stage has many significant disadvantages. 1. A high degree of uncertainty: Reverse logistics location, time and recovery quality and quantity is difficult to predict, which leads to the reverse logistics supply uncertainties, coupled with the recovery or reuse of product market uncertainty, the recovery of the product demand is even more difficult to predict, the balance of supply and demand difficult to master. On the contrary, the logistics of supply can be controlled according to the requirement of system. Raw materials at the appropriate time and place according to the quantity and quality of input certain production is the basic requirement, so the logistics demand for the product is almost completely composed of demand side, supply and demand to achieve balance. 2. The complexity of the operation: Reverse logistics in the recovery process and mode according to the product life cycle, product characteristics, the required resources, equipment and other conditions are different and complicated, so the ratio of new product in the forward logistics process is more uncertainty and complexity. According to the Rogers in 2001 to a survey by Usa Inc, main activities and function of reverse logistics include: remanufacturing, dressing, recycling, landfill, and packaging and processing etc.. Carter points out, is at least four environmental factors affecting the implementation of reverse logistics of a company, as consumers, suppliers, competitors and government institutions, so its difficult for the company to make strategic decisions regarding recovery mode to the efficient and economic operation of reverse logistics system. T: It seems the reverse logistics in the future still need further improvement and optimization.

Macbeth and Frankenstein

In 1818, Marry Shelley published her most famous novel – Frankenstein, which became incredibly popular, and which is often thought to have spawned the whole genre of Science Fiction in literature. It has been praised for its originality and appeal to wide audiences while at the same time having great artistic value.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Macbeth and Frankenstein specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More On the other hand, Macbeth is a play written by William Shakespeare around the year 1605. Apart from their popularity and fame, at the first glance, one would have trouble finding any similarities of the two works. Frankenstein is a science-fiction novel written in the Gothic tradition in the 19th century, while Macbeth is a classic play written in the Elizabethan period by William Shakespeare. However, on a closer look, it is easy to see how these two works are very similar when it comes to the overall me ssage and idea. This is particularly evident when we compare the character of Macbeth with that of Frankenstein’s monster in terms of their tragic flaws. The transformations that corrupted Frankenstein’s creature and Macbeth are both triggered by envy, making these two characters analogous. First off, it is important to realize how Frankenstein’s monster and Macbeth were not corrupted from the beginning, but rather that the corruption was something that happened to them. The first impression the characters give is not that of someone who can easily become corrupted. In the being of the play, we assume that Macbeth is akin to the king, a loyal soldier and a person â€Å"full of milk of human kindness†. We expect nothing evil from Macbeth until the witches approach him for the first time. His hunger for power increased after realizing that becoming a king is an open possibility. Frankenstein’s creature, on the other hand, used to be â€Å"kinder, mo re loving, and more poetic than his creator (Bissonette 110). All that Frankenstein’s creature ever wanted was to be accepted by humans. He helped the family in the cottage in doing the chores. He learned the language and the way in which humans interact so he could have a chance of acceptance. They both fell into evil because of their desire. Their tragic flaw was in that their desire was stronger than their morals. Both of these characters started out as innocent beings, but then turned into beasts. A beast is depicted as a cruel, filthy, inhuman creature. Macbeth and Frankenstein are great examples of beasts. Macbeth shows no emotion towards the things that should matter to him. When Lady Macbeth committed suicide, Macbeth only uttered the following words, â€Å"She should have died hereafter; / there would have been a time for such a word.† (Shakespeare 5.5.18).Advertising Looking for essay on comparative literature? Let's see if we can help you! Get your firs t paper with 15% OFF Learn More The realization that his wife is dead did not affect him on the emotional level. His killing spree caused him to become heartless and inhuman. Macbeth changed from a person â€Å"full of milk and human kindness† into a person for whom â€Å"death has no meaning (Waith 66)† Macbeth was willing to kill his friends and slaughter a whole family to get what he wants. We can clearly see that Macbeth is really a symbol of a Machiavellian character in the world of literature when Eugene Waith (64) says, â€Å"His mental torments grows out of the conflict between the narrow concept of man as the courageous male and the more inclusive concept of man as a being whose moral nature distinguishes him from the beast† While Macbeth became a beast, Frankenstein’s creature really was a beast, at least in the physical sense. His physical appearance is nothing like the human body. As Kate Ellis puts it: Had Victor not been so furtive about his desire to astound the world, he might have allowed himself time to make a creation his own size, one who mirrored the whole of him, not just the part of himself he cannot bring home. Nobody would accept him, he is just a beast in everyone eyes. Robert Walton could not recognize the sight he saw â€Å"a being that had the shape of a man, but apparently of gigantic stature† (Shelly 13)(Ellis) However, when he saw Victor Frankenstein, he immediately recognized him as a human and pulled him aboard to help him. Frankenstein’s creature, similarly to Macbeth, became a beast on the inside, too. Frankenstein’s creature murdered everyone who mattered to Victor, and he did anything he could to get revenge on his creator. These characters are good examples of beasts, but, again, they were not beasts from the start, it is rather that their personalities contained tragic flaws which lead them to become ones. The difference, as I see it, is only in that Macbethâ€⠄¢s flaw was within himself, but Frankenstein’s creature became a beast out of the feeling of rejection and despair. Both of these characters are creations for someone else’s benefit. Macbeth was happy with the power and the rank he already had, but people incited him to think differently. It all started when the weird sister told Macbeth of a prophecy of becoming king. Without the weird sister, Macbeth would not have thought about killing Duncan. Lady Macbeth persuaded Macbeth to assassinate the king for her own benefits. The only way for her to gain power was to use Macbeth’s advancement and gain more power as he becomes more and more influential.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Macbeth and Frankenstein specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Things changed once the first murder happened. Macbeth became a new person, a person who can kill anyone that stands in his way, even friends and family. It is as Bernance Kliman says, â€Å"her [lady Macbeth’s] actual power over Macbeth, now that the murder has been committed is diminishing† (Kliman 73). This is because, after that, Macbeth’s ethical views change, and he himself becomes thirsty for blood and power. Frankenstein’s creature is a creation of Victor Frankenstein for a reason which is also, in a way related to power. Victor Frankenstein created the creature for fame, fortune, and to be recognized as the father of a branch science. Victor Frankenstein is â€Å"trying to play God or usurp divine power in order to get fame† (Baldick 43). At the point when he succeeded in creating life, we become â€Å"confronted immediately by the displacement of God and woman from the acts of conception and birth† (Ellis). The realization that humans are able to create life causes an immense feeling of power and self-sufficiency. Victor Frankenstein never thought about what the consequences of creati ng life would be. He rushed into it, and did not even realize what his creation could be like until it actually came to life. â€Å"Victor doesn’t value the life he is to create so much as what the creation will give him (Lunsford 175)†. If he had actually looked at what he was creating, instead of thinking only about the fame that the creation would give him, maybe he would have thought about it a little more. Once the creature came to life, he fled because the creature’s appearance was too monstrous and scary. â€Å"Victor’s worst sin is not the creation, but his refusal to take responsibility for it. It is as though God had withdrawn from his creation (Ellis)†. It is true that knowledge is power and power corrupts, and Macbeth and Frankenstein’s creature are two pieces of evidence for that claim. Knowing that he can become a king caused Macbeth to become a monster. Knowing something that should not be learned corrupts the mind, â€Å"kno wledge is shown to be double edged, it has benefits and hazards†. Since Macbeth knows that becoming a king is not an impossible task, he starts to strive for it. An example of this is when he says, â€Å"Stars hide your fires, let not light see my black and deep desires† (Shakespeare 1.4). Frankenstein’s creature, on the other hand, is quite different. If Victor Frankenstein had not had the knowledge or the motivation to create life, the monster would not have been made in the first place. Victor is an example of how having the wrong kind of knowledge can cause evil. In other words, the knowledge itself is not value neutral – there are simply facts about the world which are dangerous to know. Another way in which knowledge corrupted Frankenstein’s creature is the fact that he learned his true identity. Frankenstein’s creature believed that he resembles Adam in the sense that both of them have no knowledge. He realized that he is not like Adam , and that he is more like Satan because Adam is a creation of God and he ate the fruit of knowledge.Advertising Looking for essay on comparative literature? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More When he learned more about the lost paradise, he realized that he is very similar to Satan because Satan is a fallen angel. Realizing that he is not like one of the characters in Paradise Lost, lead him to conclude that he is a monster. This is when he decided to take revenge on Victor Frankenstein, and kill everyone close to him. It is as Chris Baldick (54) says, â€Å"The condition of solitude cannot be cured, only sharpened, by knowledge†. Both of these characters are victims of their own culture. The time setting of the story in Macbeth is in the medieval times. During that time, status was the most important thing. Macbeth’s culture contributed to his desire for power and advancement through the ranks. Lady Macbeth urged Macbeth to kill Duncan and become a king because at that time, people would do anything to rise in status and create a better future for themselves and their heirs. Frankenstein’s creature is a victim of his culture, too. It is society that rejected him so he is, then, only a metaphor of a monster. Frankenstein’s creature is not really a monster, it is just that people see him as one. Frankenstein’s creature is actually a caring and loving person. He just needs to be accepted and not judged by his appearance. The aspect of supernatural is common to both characters. Macbeth caused supernatural occurrences when he killed Duncan. The play, as a whole, deals with the supernatural to a great extent. The weird sisters cast spells, hover through the fog of filthy air, and even set a prophecy. Once Macbeth killed Duncan everything just started to become supernatural. An example of this is when an owl killed a falcon, â€Å"A falcon, tow’ring in her pride of place, was by a mousing owl hawked at and killed† (Shakespeare 2.4) and when horses started eating each other. Another supernatural occurrence is when Macbeth is haunted by Banquo’s ghost, and the scene when Macbeth sees the future kings. Frankenstein’s creature is in a way supernatural too because it is very disputable whether humans will ever become so knowledgeable as to create life. The creation of Frankenstein’s creature defies God and life. The creature is supernatural because he is made out of other people’s body parts. Macbeth and Frankenstein’s monster are quite different as well. Macbeth is more vicious and proud. Macbeth cold bloodedly â€Å"cut [Duncan] from the nave to th’ chops, and fixed his head upon the battlement (Shakespeare 1.2.21)† Macbeth had no emotion, when Lady Macbeth died he did not care and only said that she would have died anyways. Even though Macbeth knew he was going to die, he still fought till his death, â€Å"at least we will die with the harness on our back (Shakespeare 5.6.50).† He knew his death is inevitable because the forest began to move, and he met someone that was not born of a woman – Macduff. Macbeth never regretted what he had done but Frankenstein’s creature did. The creature is ashamed of the fact that he became a murderer. Unlike Macbeth, when Frankenstein’s creature noticed that Victor died, he was miserable and could not come to terms with what he had done. Victor Frankenstein was the only person that the creature could talk to and his only chance for acceptance. Finally, there is one crucial difference that has to be mentioned, and that is the fact that Macbeth had a lot more control over his destiny and should therefore be thought of as responsible for his downfall much more than Frankenstein’s creature. In the case of Frankenstein’s creature, we can clearly identify several points at which other people determined his destiny. The first point was when Victor created him without much consideration about the consequences. The second major point was when the family with which he spent time also rejected him for fear of being themselves rejected by the community . It is only after these two events took place that we could say that the creature should not have exerted such a terrible revenge upon his creator. On the other hand, in the case of Macbeth, we did identify two external contributors to his downfall (his wife and the cultural setting), but it is clear that he was in a much better position than Frankenstein’s monster. What he simply needed to do was to reject any ideas of committing immoral acts for the sake of gaining power. Therefore, it is natural to conclude that more blame should be placed on Macbeth because he clearly had more of a choice. In conclusion, although it might appear that there is no basis for comparing Frankenstein’s creature and Macbeth, it seems that they are fundamentally similar in a number of ways, but they also have quite a few differences. I have pointed out that neither of them was corrupted from the start, and that corruption was rather something that happened to them. In addition, it might b e argued that the cause of their downfall was at least to an extent external to them, although this claim is much stronger in the case of Frankenstein’s monster. Furthermore, the search for knowledge and power also played an important role in the downfalls of both of them, the only difference being that in the case of the monster, the terrible consequences came as a result of somebody else’s search for knowledge. The basic difference, which I would point out, is that it seems that Macbeth had more control over his destiny and thus had more responsibility for his downfall, while Frankenstein’s monster was, in fact, a result of a series of unfortunate events, and other people’s errors. Works Cited Baldick, Chris. In Frankenstein’s shadow: myth, monstrosity, and nineteenth-century writing. Oxford [Oxfordshire: Clarendon Press ; 1987. Print. Bissonette, Melissa. â€Å"Teaching the Monster: Frankenstein and Critical Thinking.† College Literature 37 (2010): 106-120. Print. Ellis, Kate. â€Å"Monsters in the Garden.† Frankenstein: The Pennsylvania Electronic Edition. N.p., n.d. Web. http://knarf.english.upenn.edu/Articles/ellis1.html. Kliman, Bernice W. Macbeth. Manchester: Manchester University Press ;, 1992. Print. Lunsford, Lars. â€Å"The Devaluing of Life in Shelley’s FRANKENSTEIN.† The Explicator 68 (2010): 174-176. Print. Shakespeare, William. Macbeth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. Print. Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft. Frankenstein. Charlottesville, Va.: University of Virginia Library, 1996. Print. Waith, Eugene. â€Å"Manhood and Valor in Two Shakespearean Tragedies.† ELH: a Journal of English Literary History 17 (1950): 63-66. Print. This essay on Macbeth and Frankenstein was written and submitted by user Mustafa Z. to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.