FINAL Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

FINAL - Essay ExampleThe moral social structure of diplomacy remains essentially the same for all officials because they are all charged to obey and carry out the law and respect legal process in exercising their power and judgment (Victoria 1). Discretion is touch on in every matter of professional life for a street- aim government employee. A front specify officer is unremarkably more involved in dealing with commonplace matters because he/she has to deal with public more than the higher ranked officials do. A front note government officer should exercise his/her judgment in resolving public matters instead of sending every simple case to higher authorities. For example, a law officer should have the power to decide whether he/she should resolve a conflicting stake on his/her own or he/she should send the case to the court to decide on it. However, it depends on the nature of the case. If a case is not very complex and both conflicting parties come to the police officer to suggest a solution for them, then the police officer should make the last on his/her own. such kickshaws in day-to-day work not only enhance the ability of front line government offices to the critical decisions but also reduce the load of work for the government agencies. For example, if a police officer resolves simple conflicts between people on his/her own, it will reduce the workload for the court which is usually already burdened with a number of cases. However, sometimes discretion in day-today activities does not work come up for the society. The reason is that the reasoning and logic that a person at a higher level flock give related to public administration matters is different from the mindset of a person working as a front line government employee. Higher appointments are done based on the level of qualification and intellectual ability of people. Such people deal take wise decisions by smell all aspects of matters. For example, a decision that a judge can tak e is more wise and merit-based than the decision that a front line police officer takes. Similarly, a decision that the manager of an organization can take for employees is more applicable and rational as compared to the decision that an employee takes for his/her work. Therefore, we can say that the consequences if street-level bureaucrats have discretion in their day-to-day activities vary from case to case. However, the negative consequences are not able to overcome the benefits associated with discretion to day-to-day works, such as, enhanced intellectual ability and reduced workload for government agencies. Every elected, appointed, and life official must exercise judgment and discretion in carrying out the duties and responsibilities of office (Victoria 1). Part B The fundamental assumption of administrative reformers in the late 1800s and early 1900s that politics could have only unfavorable effects on administration was true up to some extent. The reason is that the politi cs of that time had interconnected such elements which could have disturbed the administrative approaches and systems of almost every department. Some of such elements included hurt of power, reducing the rights of others, and political instability. All of these elements played their roles in running the political matters of Central European countries. Such elements could have broken the